<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>River of the Letter Wood &#187; CopyLeft Movement</title>
	<atom:link href="http://riveroftheletterwood.com/category/copyleft-movement/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://riveroftheletterwood.com</link>
	<description>co-creating a sustainable, egalitarian, decentralized world</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 16:59:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>White House Website Switches To Open Source</title>
		<link>http://riveroftheletterwood.com/2009/10/white-house-website-switches-to-open-source/</link>
		<comments>http://riveroftheletterwood.com/2009/10/white-house-website-switches-to-open-source/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 15:52:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>seeta</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CopyLeft Movement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Creativity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Decentralized Medium]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Information Age]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Systems of Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyleft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free culture movement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open source]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://riveroftheletterwood.com/?p=264</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Obama admin has switched from a proprietary content management system in favor of open-source Drupal software. "Open source is a great form of civic participation," the White House's new media director Macon Phillips said.  Dries Buytaert added, "this is a clear sign that governments realize that Open Source does not pose additional risks compared to proprietary software, and furthermore, that by moving away from proprietary software, they are not being locked into a particular technology, and that they can benefit from the innovation that is the result of thousands of developers collaborating."

<b><a href="http://techpresident.com/blog-entry/whitehousegov-goes-drupal">Read the rest of the piece here</a></b>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Obama admin has switched from a proprietary content management system in favor of open-source Drupal software. &#8220;Open source is a great form of civic participation,&#8221; the White House&#8217;s new media director Macon Phillips said.  Dries Buytaert added, &#8220;this is a clear sign that governments realize that Open Source does not pose additional risks compared to proprietary software, and furthermore, that by moving away from proprietary software, they are not being locked into a particular technology, and that they can benefit from the innovation that is the result of thousands of developers collaborating.&#8221;</p>
<p><b><a href="http://techpresident.com/blog-entry/whitehousegov-goes-drupal">Read the rest of the piece here</a></b>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://riveroftheletterwood.com/2009/10/white-house-website-switches-to-open-source/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Michael Moore: pirate my film, please</title>
		<link>http://riveroftheletterwood.com/2009/10/michael-moore-pirate-my-film-please/</link>
		<comments>http://riveroftheletterwood.com/2009/10/michael-moore-pirate-my-film-please/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 19:21:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>seeta</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CopyLeft Movement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Creativity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Decentralized Medium]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deconstructing Race]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Information Age]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexuality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spirituality/Cosmology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Systems of Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White Privilege]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capitalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capitalism: A Love Story]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Creative Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Moore]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://riveroftheletterwood.com/?p=212</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In 2004, <a href="http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/4301">Micheal Moore went on record</a>:

<blockquote>I don’t agree with the copyright laws and I don’t have a problem with people downloading the movie and sharing it with people as long as they’re not trying to make a profit off my labour. I would oppose that. I do well enough already and I made this film because I want the world, to change. The more people who see it the better, so I’m happy this is happening. Is it wrong for someone who’s bought a film on DVD to let a friend watch it for free? Of course it’s not. It never has been and never will be. I think information, art and ideas should be shared.</blockquote>

I have yet to see <em>Moore's Capitalism: A Love Story</em>.  The fact that Moore did not release his latest documentary under a <a href="http://creativecommons.org/">Creative Commons License</a>, in my view, undermines his credibility, motivation, intention, and message.  <a href="http://www.sitasingstheblues.com">It's not like we have the technology to disseminate and distribute films to a wide audience for free</a>.

My view is, if you're going to criticize an economic system and advocate for a different, more justiciable economic system, then it behooves you as an activist, journalist, and filmmaker to operate within the structures of the more justiciable economic system -- especially when those alternative structures already exist.  Lead by example.  Walk the walk.  Get it?  What was it that Mahatma Ghandi said, something about <b>"Be the change you wish to see in the world."</b>

What gives Moore?  Why isn't your latest film released on the internet under a CC license?  If you honestly oppose the oppressive structures of capitalism, then why do you continue to prop up those structures?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>by Seeta Persaud</em></p>
<p>In 2004, <a href="http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/4301">Michael Moore went on record</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>I don’t agree with the copyright laws and I don’t have a problem with people downloading the movie and sharing it with people as long as they’re not trying to make a profit off my labour. I would oppose that. I do well enough already and I made this film because I want the world, to change. The more people who see it the better, so I’m happy this is happening. Is it wrong for someone who’s bought a film on DVD to let a friend watch it for free? Of course it’s not. It never has been and never will be. I think information, art and ideas should be shared.</p></blockquote>
<p>I have yet to see <em>Capitalism: A Love Story</em>.  The fact that Moore did not release his latest documentary under a <a href="http://creativecommons.org/">Creative Commons License</a>, in my view, undermines his credibility, motivation, intention, and message.  <a href="http://www.sitasingstheblues.com">It&#8217;s not like we have the technology to disseminate and distribute films to a wide audience for free</a>.</p>
<p>My view is, if you&#8217;re going to criticize an economic system and advocate for a different, more justiciable economic system, then it behooves you as an activist, journalist, and filmmaker to operate within the structures of the more justiciable economic system &#8212; especially when those alternative structures already exist.  Lead by example.  Walk the walk.  Get it?  What was it that Mahatma Ghandi said, something about <b>&#8220;Be the change you wish to see in the world.&#8221;</b></p>
<p>What gives Moore?  Why isn&#8217;t your latest film released on the internet under a CC license?  If you honestly <a href="http://library.hartford.edu/AboutUs/Lectures/plagiarism%20and%20scholarship.doc">oppose the oppressive structures of capitalism</a>, then why do you continue to prop up those structures when you clearly have a prime opportunity, the voice, and privilege to educate and support alternative, more egalitarian economic structures?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://riveroftheletterwood.com/2009/10/michael-moore-pirate-my-film-please/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sita Sings the Blues</title>
		<link>http://riveroftheletterwood.com/2009/10/sita-sings-the-blues/</link>
		<comments>http://riveroftheletterwood.com/2009/10/sita-sings-the-blues/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 01:36:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>seeta</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CopyLeft Movement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Creativity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://riveroftheletterwood.com/?p=93</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From Nina Paley:

<em>Dear Audience,

I hereby give Sita Sings the Blues to you. Like all culture, it belongs to you already, but I am making it explicit with a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike License. Please distribute, copy, share, archive, and show Sita Sings the Blues. From the shared culture it came, and back into the shared culture it goes.

You don't need my permission to copy, share, publish, archive, show, sell, broadcast, or remix Sita Sings the Blues. Conventional wisdom urges me to demand payment for every use of the film, but then how would people without money get to see it? How widely would the film be disseminated if it were limited by permission and fees? Control offers a false sense of security. The only real security I have is trusting you, trusting culture, and trusting freedom.</em>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Enjoy this creative gem from artist <a href="http://www.sitasingstheblues.com/" target="_blank">Nina Paley</a>: </p>
<p><object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/p/422DA8C3B574D836&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/p/422DA8C3B574D836&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="480" height="385" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
<p><b>Be sure to show your support for Ms. Paley&#8217;s work <a href = "http://www.sitasingstheblues.com/donate.html">here</a>.</b></p>
<p>From <a href="http://www.sitasingstheblues.com/" target="_blank">Nina Paley</a>:</p>
<p><em>Dear Audience,</p>
<p>I hereby give Sita Sings the Blues to you. Like all culture, it belongs to you already, but I am making it explicit with a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike License. Please distribute, copy, share, archive, and show Sita Sings the Blues. From the shared culture it came, and back into the shared culture it goes.</p>
<p>You don&#8217;t need my permission to copy, share, publish, archive, show, sell, broadcast, or remix Sita Sings the Blues. Conventional wisdom urges me to demand payment for every use of the film, but then how would people without money get to see it? How widely would the film be disseminated if it were limited by permission and fees? Control offers a false sense of security. The only real security I have is trusting you, trusting culture, and trusting freedom.</p>
<p><span id="more-93"></span></p>
<p>That said, my colleagues and I will enforce the Share Alike License. You are not free to copy-restrict (&#8221;copyright&#8221;) or attach Digital Restrictions Management (DRM) to Sita Sings the Blues or its derivative works.</p>
<p>Some of the songs in Sita Sings the Blues are not free, and may never be; copyright law requires you to obey their respective licenses. This is not by my choice; please see our restrictions page for more.</p>
<p>There is the question of how I&#8217;ll get money from all this. My personal experience confirms audiences are generous and want to support artists. Surely there&#8217;s a way for this to happen without centrally controlling every transaction. The old business model of coercion and extortion is failing. New models are emerging, and I&#8217;m happy to be part of that. But we&#8217;re still making this up as we go along. You are free to make money with the free content of Sita Sings the Blues, and you are free to share money with me. People have been making money in Free Software for years; it&#8217;s time for Free Culture to follow. I look forward to your innovations.</p>
<p>If you have questions, please ask each other. If you have ideas, please implement them &#8211; you don&#8217;t need my permission or anyone else&#8217;s (except for the copyright-restricted songs, of course).  If you see abuses, please address them, but don&#8217;t get bogged down in arcane details of copyright law.  The copyright system wants you to think in terms of asking permission; I want you to think in terms of freedom. We&#8217;ve set up this Wiki to get things started. Feel free to improve it!</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve got to get back to my life now, and make some new art. Thanks for your support! This film wouldn&#8217;t exist without you.</p>
<p>Love,</p>
<p>&#8211;Nina Paley</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://riveroftheletterwood.com/2009/10/sita-sings-the-blues/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
